The pace of cost cutting in the mid-cap market is continuing to slow, according to analysis by Westwood Global.
The consultancy studied the income statements of 22 mid-cap international exploration and production companies between 2014 and the first half of 2017.
The energy group found that unit costs were reduced in the first half of the year but the pace of unit cost cutting continues to slow.
The first six months of 2017 marked the first of the time periods studied where the impairment/boe cost was not the highest unit cost on the companies’ combined income statement.
The weighted average Brent breakeven oil price – the price at which the 22 companies would breakeven on a pre-tax net income basis – is down from $64/bbl in 2014 to $40/bbl – a 37% decrease.
The table pictured shows the combined mmboe production across the 22 companies and their overall $/boe metrics for each period, along with the average Brent price, the Brent discount in the companies’ revenue, and the resultant implied Brent breakeven price.
This data is then depicted graphically to show year-on-year trends.
The overall unit cost base (comprising Opex, General And Administrative Expense (G&A), Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization (DDA), and finance) has declined from $40/boe in 2014 to $30/boe in 2017 H1; a decrease of 26%.
However, the reductions in the cost base have progressively diminished.
The impairment-driven DDA unit cost reductions account for 45% of the $10/boe decrease, and Opex savings account for 44%.
Over the same period, the realised revenue/boe has tracked the Brent oil price, however, the discount to Brent has reduced from 37% in 2014 to 25% in 2017 H1.
Analyst Robert Stevens wrote: “This is probably due to the presence of some gas pricing contracts not linked to oil prices.
“The combined effect of both the cost base reduction and the Brent discount reduction has meant that the decrease in the effective Brent breakeven price for the 22 companies has been much more pronounced, falling nearly $24/bbl from $64/bbl in 2014 to $40/bbl in 2017 H1.
“Following a 27% reduction in overall Opex/boe between 2014 and 2015, Opex/boe has remained essentially unchanged since then. Easier cost savings were quickly achieved following the oil price downturn, but further savings have proven more difficult to achieve.”
He added: “DDA/boe costs have reduced by 28% since 2014, but this is partly driven by cumulative impairments of $27.3bn over the time period.
“It is therefore hard to tell how much of these cost savings are structural, and will be applied in the longer term, as opposed to being impairment-driven (for DDA) or market-driven (for Opex). If oil prices continue to rise, will unit cost bases simply follow suit?”
Recommended for you
Read the latest opinion pieces from our Energy Voice columnists
- Opinion: Apart from oil sector tax break, Budget was an anti-climax
- Opinion: Out with the old and in with the reconditioned
- Opinion: All the hard work starting to pay off for Aberdeen and north-east
- Opinion: EY’s Derek Leith on what to expect from the Budget
- Opinion: Carbon capture and storage – put the kettle on