Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Green groups reject Shell’s Brent oilfield decommissioning plans

Shell news
Shell news

Environmental groups have rejected Shell’s plans to decommission the Brent oilfield in the North Sea.

The groups claim the oil giant’s proposals contain “insufficient information“ and could breach international rules.

Shell has lodged plans with the UK Government’s Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy to decommission four of its platforms, and has asked for permission to leave the concrete legs of three of them on the seabed.

The firm said the safety risks associated with trying to remove them outweigh “minimal environmental benefit”.

A 60-day consultation on the proposals ends on Monday.

WWF Scotland, Greenpeace UK, the Marine Conservation Society, Friends of the Earth Scotland, Kimo, Whale and Dolphin Conservation, the Scottish Wildlife Trust and RSPB Scotland have submitted a joint response.

The organisations say that Shell has not provided enough detail on its plans.

WWF Scotland director Lang Banks said: “Despite over 3,000 pages of documentation, it has not been possible to come to a view on Shell’s decommissioning proposal due to insufficient information being provided by the company across several key areas.

“The internationally-agreed Ospar rules set out very clear criteria and procedures for operators to follow in carrying out such assessments, but we do not believe they have not been fully adhered to in this case.

“The material presented cannot be clearly cross-referenced to the Ospar requirements, meaning we cannot assess whether or not there is a solid case for the derogations sought by Shell.

“We are therefore left with no choice but to reject Shell’s plans in their current state and have asked for key further information in order to adequately assess their proposals.”

Ospar is the mechanism by which governments co-operate to protect the marine environment in the North-East Atlantic.

Mr Banks added: “Given the enormous size of the rigs and the iconic nature of the Brent field, its decommissioning is being watched closely, both here and globally, and it should therefore be aiming to set the highest possible benchmarks for the rest of the industry to follow.

“If done right, it could open the door for this country to lead a new multibillion-pound, global decommissioning industry that could create thousands of jobs as we continue our transition away from fossil fuels.”

A Shell spokeswoman said: “Shell welcomes the feedback which has been received from stakeholders and members of the public during the 60-day public consultation period for the Brent field.

“The consultation concludes today and, over the coming weeks, we will continue to review and respond to the comments received.”

Green MSP Mark Ruskell said: “Today’s warning from numerous environmental groups about Shell’s plans must be taken seriously.

“Cleaning up the legacy of the Brent oilfield is a chance we cannot afford to miss.

“The four platforms and associated miles of pipelines are on a much bigger scale than the Brent Spar project, which saw public condemnation, boycott and direct action against Shell when they tried to sink a redundant rig.

“Big oil already receives generous public subsidy to extract a resource we know we have to start leaving in the ground.

“It would be wrong for this same industry to be allowed to walk away from a situation that could create jobs and protect the marine environment we all rely on.”

Recommended for you

Tags

More from Energy Voice

Latest Posts