Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Tie-backs to dominate North Sea projects to 2023

The Callater tieback project started production earlier this month
Apache North Sea Operations

Subsea tie-backs will be the most common development solution in the North Sea until 2023, according to new research,

Analysts GlobalData estimate that of the 63 oil and gas fields being brought to production in that period in the UK, Denmark, Norway and the Netherlands, 34 will be subsea tie-backs.

The Gulf of Mexico has a higher rate of tie-backs at 23 out of 30 until 2023.

From total estimated spending of £53.9billion on North Sea projects, almost £11billion will be spent on tie-backs.

GlobalData estimates the trend could be due to fewer large discoveries in the region.

By 2023, GlobalData said that planned and announced fields in the North Sea are expected to contribute 1.6million barrels of oil equivalent per day, with 500,000 barrels expected to come from tie-back projects.

That represents an average development net present value per barrel of nearly US $6.

The North Sea has a higher Internal Rate of Return (IRR)  of 45% for subsea developments than the Gulf of Mexico at 32%.

IRR is a means of estimating the profitability of potential investments.

Luis Pereira, oil and gas analyst at GlobalData, said: “Tie-back developments become ideal solutions for operators looking to maintain the short to medium term production outlook, providing a quicker return-to-investment when compared to larger stand-alone developments.

“Average payback time is less than six years, the shortest time for all development type solutions.

“The rise of the number of subsea tie-backs projects in the North Sea is perhaps also due to the few large discoveries been made in the region, as is also the trend in the US GoM.

“These types of developments become an attractive solution for operators looking to fill the mid-term production outlook gaps with lower capital risks.”

Recommended for you


More from Energy Voice

Latest Posts