Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Marine jobs potential after ‘shock of North Sea oil exploration’

SWT argues a series of jobs related to the marine environment could be created if old oil platforms are left in place.
SWT argues a series of jobs related to the marine environment could be created if old oil platforms are left in place.

Keeping old oil and gas platforms in place could be a “triple win” for the North Sea, creating a fresh wave of employment, according to a conservationist group.

The Scottish Wildlife Trust said keeping part of the infrastructure could create new marine research jobs “after the shock of oil and gas exploration”, while giving evidence to the Scottish Affairs Committee yesterday.

The organisation told the Westminster inquiry into the future of the sector that certain structures have an abundance of marine life around them, and it is not in the best environmental interests to remove them.

The taxpayer has a liability of around £24billion for decommissioning oil platforms, and CEO Jonathan Hughes said savings from this could be put in a “marine stewardship fund” for fresh employment.

He said it could be “very expensive and not necessarily smart” if the industry wasn’t creative with decommissioning.

The rigs-to-reef concept, which is currently being used in the Gulf of Mexico,  also has potential from a leisure tourism perspective, according to Mr Hughes.

He said: “Some flexibility on derogations could lead to better outcomes for the operator, taxpayer and the environment.

“There is scope for putting some of those savings into a fund which could then be used to provide employment in areas such as the east coast, but not necessarily to do with the kind of technical aspects of decommissioning.

“It could be to do with broader marine environmental restoration or marine research and so on in the North Sea generally, as we move towards the recovery of the North Sea after the shock of oil and gas exploration.

“There could be substantial savings to the taxpayer, to the operator and a net positive effect on the environment in the retention of these highly biodiverse structures.”

However, the issue for the reuse of these structures lies in environmental regulations.

Ospar, a pan-European body which was set up to protect the marine environment of the north-east Atlantic, requires companies to remove installations in their entirety once they reach the end of their production cycle.

Some can apply for exemptions, however Mr Hughes said the vast majority are not currently eligible.

The UK’s Offshore Petroleum Regulator for Environment and Decommissioning (OPRED) has previously described the rigs-to-reef concept as a non-starter.

David Duguid, Scottish Conservative MP for Banff and Buchan, is on the committee and is sceptical about its potential.

He said: “The big question when it comes to leaving structures in place is how we get around the Ospar convention.

“As things stand, leaving disused installations either wholly or partly in place is generally prohibited.

“I fear public opinion is being allowed to hold sway over environmental and technical concerns at present. We should certainly explore this, but I have yet to see sufficient evidence that it is the best option.”

Recommended for you

More from Energy Voice

Latest Posts