Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Hat-trick of losses won’t stop protestors from taking oil industry to court

© Supplied by Greenpeaceoil court protestors
Greenpeace made a legal challenge against permits for the Vorlich oil field last year.

A trio of high-profile losses is unlikely to stem “concerted attempts” by protestors to challenge the North Sea oil industry in court.

Legal experts have highlighted that, although the Paid to Pollute group lost a challenge against the UK Government and the Oil and Gas Authority (OGA) last week, the activists were successful in raising profile.

The case last week, challenging the UK Government on the OGA’s North Sea oil strategy, followed an unsuccessful attempt from Greenpeace last year to get a court order to thwart Ithaca Energy and BP from producing the Vorlich oil field.

That episode followed a hearing in 2020 which saw Greenpeace fined £80,000 for a protest the prior year which saw activists board a rig heading for the same field.

Valerie Allan, Aberdeen-based energy disputes partner at the CMS law firm, said there is a “wider and growing trend” of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) using court processes to influence public opinion on the oil and gas industry.

She said: “While we’ve seen very few examples of direct success, campaigners have succeeded in generating extensive profile through these cases in highlighting concerns about climate change – that was certainly the outcome of the Paid to Pollute action against the OGA – and it therefore seems likely that this trend will continue.”

protestors oil court © Supplied by CMS/ Burness Paull/
L-R: Valerie Allan of CMS, Neil Smith of Burness Paull, Jacqueline Harris of Pinsent Masons.

Less clear, she added, is whether these court actions will have a measureable and significant impact on the government and regulator, although “they are certainly having an effect in terms of the time and resources required in responding to legal challenges”.

Her colleague Jacqueline Harris, a partner and litigation expert at Pinsent Masons, said the OGA, whose strategy was being tested, will be “encouraged” by the decision made by Mrs Justice Cockerill last week.

It shows that “the courts will afford considerable deference to an expert regulator such as the OGA and will not readily interfere with the discretionary decision making process conferred on the regulator by Parliament”, she added.

Cry Wolf

Although UK court cases have been unsuccessful of late, a notable exception is that of NGO Milieudefensie which succeeded in getting a Dutch court to order oil giant Shell to slash its emissions last year.

That case, alongside others, point to “concerted attempts by protesters to utilise every avenue open to them”, said Burness Paull partner Neil Smith, which “is understandable when they are seeking to keep the issues of the Climate Crisis in focus”.

Mr Smith said such action is the “mark of a mature democracy” and show a “creditable level of ‘access to justice’”.

However, repeated litigation can bring other risks, he warned.

“It is wise to pick your battles to avoid the risk of being labelled as ‘crying wolf’ and potentially diluting important messages through fatigue or apathy.”

Recommended for you

More from Energy Voice

Latest Posts