Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Shell to learn outcome of bid to block case from being heard in English court

Shell news
Shell news

Oil giant Shell finds out today if it has won a battle to block claims brought against it by more than 40,000 Nigerians from being heard by the English courts.

A High Court judge in London has been asked to rule that the court does not have jurisdiction to try actions by two Nigerian communities over oil spills in the Niger Delta.

Royal Dutch Shell (RDS) and the Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria (SPDC) argue that the cases should be heard by the courts in Nigeria.

But the communities believe they will only get “justice” in the English courts.

UK law firm Leigh Day, which is representing the two communities, says the claims are over “extensive environmental damage caused by oil pollution”.

One action has been brought on behalf of the Ogale Community in Ogoniland, which consists of around 40,000 people.

Leigh Day says the community “has been subjected to repeated oil spills from Shell’s pipelines over a number of years which have still not been cleaned up”.

The other case relates to 2,335 individuals from the Bille Kingdom of Nigeria, who are mostly fishermen.

They claim their environment has been “devastated” by oil spills over the past five years.

Lord Goldsmith QC, for Anglo-Dutch giant RDS, and its subsidiary SPDC, told Mr Justice Fraser at a hearing last year that the cases concerned “fundamentally Nigerian issues”.

He said: “They are brought by many thousands of Nigerian claimants – with thousands more in the wings – in respect of pollution in the Niger Delta said to emanate from Nigerian infrastructure in which the Nigerian state has a majority interest.

“The claims raise issues of Nigerian common law, customary law and legislation.

“The events are said to have occurred in Nigeria and the alleged physical damage is all said to be found in Nigeria.”

He submitted: “The claims concern a uniquely Nigerian problem. It is not in dispute that oil pipeline sabotage, bunkering and illegal crude oil refining activities are widespread in Nigeria and that the overall security situation is highly volatile.

“These illegal activities are routinely reported in the media and highly visible to local communities, some of whose inhabitants must be complicit in it.

“In recent months, the Nigerian armed forces have taken to air strikes in an attempt to curtail the worst of them.”

Lord Goldsmith said the attempt to sue RDS “in relation to the alleged acts or omissions of SPDC is obviously a device aimed at procuring an ’anchor defendant’ in England for the purpose of
attempting to persuade the English court to exercise jurisdiction over SPDC, a Nigerian domiciled company which has always operated exclusively in Nigeria”.

But Richard Hermer QC argued that the High Court does have jurisdiction to hear what were “legitimate” claims, submitting: “In each set of proceedings the claimants allege that RDS and SPDC are
liable for the same damage caused by numerous oil spills in the areas where the respective communities live.”

His Royal Highness Emere Godwin Bebe Okpabi, tribal king of the Ogale community, attended the hearing and said outside court that this country was the “only place we can get justice”.

Recommended for you

More from Energy Voice

Latest Posts