Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Cost of excluding wind farms from UK’s most scenic areas revealed in Aberdeen Uni study

Aberdeen Uni wind scenic
Donald Trump, pictured in 2014, fervently opposed the creation of the Aberdeen Bay Wind Farm

A new study from Aberdeen University has put the spotlight on the cost of excluding wind farms from the most scenic areas of the UK.

It shows that keeping wind developments out of 10% of the most picturesque sites in Britain means 18% less renewable electricity generation potential and up to 26% higher costs for operators.

The project, led by professor Russell McKenna of the university’s School of Engineering, used data from the “Scenic or Not” website, where users rate pictures of sites across the country on their scenic value.

It is the first time that data has been used at a national scale to judge how the beauty of the environment impacts wind farm developments, with north-east Scotland being no stranger to opposition to such projects.

Prior to becoming US president, Donald Trump engaged in a war of words, which led to a Supreme Court battle, over plans for the Aberdeen Bay Wind Farm.

Mr Trump described the Vattenfall project as “ugly” and argued that opposing the “horrendous looking, noisy and inefficient structures” was “for the benefit of Scotland”.

The 11-turbine windfarm started up off the Aberdeen coast in 2018 and the following year Mr Trump was forced to pay the Scottish Government’s legal costs over the court battle.

Professor McKenna believes the Aberdeen University research will help policymakers balance the trade-off between public acceptance of wind projects in scenic areas and the price of fighting climate change.

He said: “Compromises are required at all levels to achieve the energy transition. To effectively address these compromises, policy needs to incentivise investments in onshore wind that consider both cost and landscape as quality criteria.

“Previously, the beauty of our environment has proven very challenging to quantify at scale due to a lack of appropriate data.  This study plugs that gap by drawing on more than a million ratings of more than 200,000 photographs and feeding the data into a model of onshore wind generation.”

Professor McKenna worked alongside academics from Germany, the Netherlands and Denmark on the study, which has been published in the scientific journal Nature Energy.

Earlier this week Aberdeen University officially opened its Centre for Energy Transition, whose mission is to “bring the power of interdisciplinary research to bear” on the climate crisis.

Professor George Boyne, university vice principal and chancellor, said the centre would “think deeply and act quickly” to support the transition.

Recommended for you

More from Energy Voice

Latest Posts