Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Heriot-Watt team takes hydrates project into third phase

Heriot-Watt team takes hydrates  project into third phase
Researchers at Heriot-Watt University's Centre for Gas Hydrate Research have kicked off phase three of a joint industry project that aims to develop a Hydrate Monitoring and Early Warning System (HMEWS).

Researchers at Heriot-Watt University’s Centre for Gas Hydrate Research have kicked off phase three of a joint industry project that aims to develop a Hydrate Monitoring and Early Warning System (HMEWS).

The project secured support from five operating companies with help from the Industry Technology Facilitator (ITF), which is based in Aberdeen.

Gas hydrates are ice-like crystalline molecular complexes that can form from mixtures of water and gas molecules under the high pressure, low temperature conditions that commonly occur in offshore pipelines.

The formation of gas hydrates can cause major flow assurance problems and, as the industry continues to mature with more developments in deeper waters, longer subsea tiebacks and higher water cuts, formation of gas hydrates is likely to become more of a problem.

Prof Bahman Tohidi, director of the Centre for Gas Hydrate Research, told Energy that a number of approaches are used to control the formation of gas hydrates, including pipeline heating, insulation and chemical inhibitors.

Currently, hydrate inhibitors are injected at the upstream end of pipelines, but in general, no means have been available along the pipeline or downstream to assess the degree of inhibition.

Inhibitor dosages are based on the calculated or measured hydrate phase boundary, water cut, worst pressure and temperature conditions, and the amount of inhibitor lost to the non-aqueous phases.

“In many cases, high safety margins are used to account for the uncertainties in these parameters and minimise the gas hydrate risks.

“However, despite all these efforts, hydrates do still form and can have considerable economic and safety impacts,” said Prof Tohidi.

Earlier phases of the HMEWS project resulted in the development of a hydrate inhibition monitoring system called HydraCHEK, which is being commercialised through Heriot-Watt University’s spin-out company, Hydrafact.

To date, the system has been purchased by two operating companies, with field trials being undertaken by a further two companies, and it is reported to have shown very promising results.

The HydraCHEK system uses electrical conductivity and acoustic velocity measurements, along with neural network-based software, to determine hydrate inhibitor concentration within the pipeline, calculate hydrate phase safety margins and, ultimately, determine the possible risk of gas hydrate formation.

This information can then be used to adjust the amount of hydrate inhibitor added to the pipeline.

Phase three of the project is aiming to develop the system further to make it more robust and also to develop a system for early detection of hydrate formation.

Prof Tohidi: “Electrical conductivity is an intrusive measurement – in other words, a sensor needs to be in the aqueous phase where it can easily become clogged. What we want to do now is replace the electrical conductivity measurements with a non-intrusive technique.

“This should reduce the need for maintenance and make the system more reliable and therefore more attractive to the operator.

“Previous phases of the project included some work on detecting the early signs of hydrate formation, which we now hope to progress towards a field trial.

“Detecting early signs of hydrate formation will allow action to be taken before a blockage occurs.

“Additionally, it can provide a back-up to the HydraCHEK system and allow greater confidence in working close to the zone of hydrate formation, thus minimising inhibitor dosing.”

Phase three will also allow some promising techniques for hydrate early warning and monitoring that were identified in earlier phases to be explored further.

Keith Mackie, ITF’s technology manager, indicated that this technology could have a number of benefits and has good potential for further development. It could reduce the incidence of hydrate blockage, and more precise dosage of hydrate inhibitors will have cost and environmental benefits.

The system could be used to automate the adjustment of inhibitor injection rates in response to the risk of hydrate formation. The technology could also see application in carbon dioxide capture and storage, as well as gas storage, where hydrate formation can be an issue.

More from Energy Voice

Latest Posts