Government made ‘grave errors’ over Hinkley Point C, claim MPs

Artist's impression issued by EDF of plans for the  Hinkley Point C nuclear power station
Artist's impression issued by EDF of plans for the Hinkley Point C nuclear power station

Consumers have been dealt a “bad hand” by the Government over the near £20 billion Hinkley Point C nuclear power station, facing costs running to many times the original estimate, it has been warned.

A committee of MPs voiced concerns that consumers are “locked into” an expensive deal lasting 35 years, questioning why the Government did not revisit the terms between the original go ahead in 2013 and now.

The Public Accounts Committee said no-one was protecting the interests of energy consumers over the deal to agree a so-called strike price of £92.50 per megawatt hour of electricity generated by the power station, which will be operated by French energy giant EDF.

The average annual household electricity bill will increase by an estimated £10 to £15 to support the new power station up to 2030, which could disproportionately impact on the poorest households, said the committee.

The value for money case for supporting Hinkley weakened after the Government agreed provisional terms in 2013, with the Business Department forecasting that consumers will now pay £30 billion in top-up payments over the contract’s 35 years, five times more than the £6 billion expected four years ago, said the report.

Labour MP Meg Hillier, who chairs the committee, said: “Bill-payers have been dealt a bad hand by the Government in its approach to this project.

“Its blinkered determination to agree the Hinkley deal, regardless of changing circumstances, means that for years to come energy consumers will face costs running to many times the original estimate.

“The Government made some grave strategic errors here and must now explain what it will do to ensure these are not repeated.

“But more than that, it must deliver the supposed wider benefits of this project – benefits Government has talked up progressively as the case for Hinkley Point C has weakened, but which it has no plan to secure.

“Government credibility in this area will inevitably be questioned when – by its own admission – it doesn’t know what UK workers and business will gain from this project, and appears to have no coherent idea of what to do about it.”

The committee urged the Government to firm up its “vague promises” of the wider benefits to UK firms and workers of the Hinkley project, adding that with Brexit looming, there is no certainty of attracting skilled workers from overseas.

The MPs said there was uncertainty over whether the project will be completed on time, warning that if there is a delay, energy security would be put at risk.

“The other projects using the same reactor technology as Hinkley Point C – in France, Finland and China – have seen significant cost and schedule overruns.

“Brexit could also have implications for the project due to withdrawal from Euratom, the pan-European atomic energy regulator, and the risk of people with nuclear engineering and science skills moving abroad,” said the report.

EDF Energy said in a statement: “The cost of Hinkley Point C for customers has not changed and they will pay nothing for its reliable, low carbon electricity until the station is completed.

“EDF and its co-investor CGN take the risk of increased costs during construction.

“The agreed price is lower than 80% of other low carbon capacity contracted so far and the project has restarted UK nuclear construction after a quarter century.

“Construction is fully under way and is already delivering a huge benefit to British jobs, skills and industrial strategy.

“It is drawing on firms from across Britain and the South West with 2,400 employees at the site and is on track to meet its next milestones.

“Hinkley Point C makes it possible for future nuclear new build projects to be significantly cheaper for customers.

“We look forward to working with HM Government to take advantage of this possibility for our projects at Sizewell and Bradwell and to make sure the UK captures the full consumer and industrial benefit of Hinkley Point C.”

Greenpeace UK head of energy Hannah Martin said: “Hinkley looked like a dodgy deal over a year ago, but now that offshore wind is so much cheaper than new nuclear, this project makes absolutely no financial sense.

“It’s time for the Government to see sense and re-think this uneconomic and unnecessary project.

“Today’s school leavers will still be paying for this as they approach pension age and all polling evidence suggests they would much rather the Conservative government back renewables.”

Breaking

    Cancel