Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

‘Threat’ to supply chain over arrival of decom work

L to R: Graeme Fergusson of Decom Energy, Innes Jordan from Nexen, Nick Dalgarno of Simmons and Co., and Barry MacLeod from Bibby Offshore
L to R: Graeme Fergusson of Decom Energy, Innes Jordan from Nexen, Nick Dalgarno of Simmons and Co., and Barry MacLeod from Bibby Offshore

The oil and gas industry has been told the supply chain needs greater clarity on when decommissioning work will arrive in order to secure its future.

Barry MacLeod, managing director of Bibby Offshore in the UK, said that without a steady amount of decommissioning jobs coming in, there won’t be enough of the supply chain left to carry out work in the future.

He was speaking at Decom Offshore yesterday at the AECC.

Mr MacLeod said: “We need better visibility of what decommissioning work is coming up and what’s out there.

“If we don’t have visibility on the timing and certainty of cessation of production dates then some of the capability is going to disappear, there is a threat of that.

“If you keep deferring it and more of the supply chain suffers and fails, there’s not going to be enough of it here to do it economically in the future.

“Maybe that’s a hand that the regulator could play in terms of getting a decent hopper of decommissioning jobs coming through, rather than this bow wave that continually gets pushed out.”

Mr MacLeod was joined by a panel who warned that the conversation must also move on to incentivising work for contractors.

That included Nexen’s decommissioning project manager Innes Jordan, managing director of investment bank Simmons and Co., Nick Dalgarno, and Graeme Fergusson, managing director of Decom Energy.

Mr Macleod’s point was agreed by Greame Fergusson from Decom Energy, who stated that if operators can clearly identify when an asset is in terminal decline, there is an opportunity to be much more efficient in the decommissioning process.

Nick Dalgarno from Simmons and Co., added that the current contractor model is “encouraging inefficiency” and there needs to be incentives.

He said: “Decommissioning is just one of the diversification strategies of a number of players in the supply chain and it hasn’t really come in for people yet and I think the question is when.

“From our client base, the most interested groups in decommissioning is vessel owners and engineering and construction contractors.

“Vessel owners make their money on day rates and E&C contractors make their money on a reimbursable cost-plus basis.

“That model which has largely been a product of the oil and gas industry and some operators trying to cut costs is actually encouraging inefficiency.

“It means you’ve got this natural tension between operators, for who it is all about costs, and people who are not being rewarded to save in the cost.

“The conversation needs to move on to alignment and incentivisation.”

Nexen’s Innes Jordan agreed that the model should be changed and there are opportunities for operators.

He said: “The best way to save costs, and perhaps even to introduce innovations and technologies is through a better contracting model, a performance-driven contracting model.

“That’s something that Nexen, not within the decommissioning space but elsewhere, have been very active in recently.

“We are trying to share more and more information with the supply chain as we come up to tenders.

“We are trying to work with everybody who is a party in our projects.

“We need to stop pretending collaboration is something to smirk at and really start getting after it and working together.”

Recommended for you

More from Energy Voice

Latest Posts