Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

UK Government ‘must be clear’ on who pays for clean energy revolution

Clean energy
Wind turbines operate on the Innogy SE wind farm in Bedburg, Germany, on Tuesday, Oct. 4, 2016. RWE's green energy business Innogy has demand for all the shares for sale in its initial public offering as the company heads toward the biggest European listing in years. Photographer: Martin Leissl/Bloomberg

The UK Government “must be clear on who will pay” for the switch to a greener economy, according to a trade union.

GMB Union argue that the methods to switch the UK energy system away from fossil fuels should come from taxation, rather than “regressive bill subsidies which hit the poorest hardest”.

The Committee for Climate Change (CCC) report warned that in order to meet its net zero emissions target by 2050, the UK Government needs to close gap between what is being done and what needs to be done to meet existing targets to curb climate change.

It also urged the UK Government to show it is serious about its legal obligations.

GMB claim that decarbonising the energy system must come from “progressive general taxation”, not through adding costs to household energy bills, which “disproportionately hit lowest paid workers and those least able to pay”.

It added that securing renewable energy jobs is now “paramount” for the UK.

Justin Bowden, GMB national secretary, said: “GMB has always said any ‘green revolution’ must be paid from general taxation – including corporation tax – rather than the utterly regressive method now of green subsidies on household energy bills which hit those least able to pay the hardest.

“It is not that UK citizens won’t pay for the costs of decarbonisation, it is simply that millions simply cannot afford it.

“Recent comments from the likes of Caroline Lucas MP that costs per head in excess of £1,500 per head per year ‘are a price worth paying’ utterly misses the point and shows how out of touch they are with millions of ordinary people who don’t have that kind of cash.

“Securing decent jobs in the renewables industry and its supply chain, and fairness in how decarbonisation costs are met, is now paramount.”

Recommended for you

More from Energy Voice

Latest Posts