Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Predictive approach to integrity management

Dr Patrick O’Brien
Dr Patrick O’Brien

A joint industry project . . . SURF IM . . . that aims to enable an integrated approach to integrity management of subsea, umbilical, riser and flowline (SURF) systems, and develop new best practice guidelines for subsea integrity management is under way.

Wood Group Kenny is leading the project, which has support from 12 of the world’s leading international operators secured with assistance from ITF, the technology facilitator for the global oil and gas industry. The project is due to be concluded in December.

As the industry evolves increasingly towards deepwater developments, exploited through remote and long distance subsea tiebacks and subsea processing systems, production will become increasingly reliant on SURF system integrity.

A cost-effective integrity management strategy has to define and implement the optimum levels of inspection and monitoring required to reliably assess the system’s integrity, but this can only be achieved with a good understanding of possible failure mechanisms and the availability of appropriate deepwater inspection and monitoring technology.

Wood Group Kenny director Patrick O’Brien told Energy: “What this project is working towards is an integrity management strategy that is aligned with the pace of SURF system technology development and use.

“We set out to take an integrated, life cycle approach and apply a consistent methodology, starting with a review of experience with systems in operation which includes classification of failure modes and mechanisms.”

SURF IM project manager Adriana Botto from Wood Group Integrity Management, a Wood Group Kenny business, added that the JIP was also reviewing existing subsea inspection and condition monitoring technologies as well as those under development, and identifying technology needs for detection and prediction of subsea equipment failures.

It is generally accepted that subsea inspection technology lags behind capability for topside and onshore systems, and this is especially true when it comes to fault-finding capability for evident and incipient failures and non-destructive testing techniques.

The hope is that a major benefit of this project will be identification of areas requiring additional development and provision of a road map to bridge the gaps between the current status of technology and the desired performance specification.

Botto said: “A particularly innovative aspect of the project, added to the initial scope at the request of participants, relates to subsea boosting and injection equipment integrity.

“The aim is to identify failure modes associated with subsea boosting and injection systems and the enabling technologies such as subsea controls, subsea power distribution, structural and mechanical designs and flow assurance technologies”.

Wood Group Kenny says that the information gathered will be used to develop a systematic approach to mapping failure modes and mechanisms of all subsea equipment (subsea structures, umbilicals, risers, flowlines, xmas trees and subsea control systems) on to a subsea integrity management system, taking the project life cycle from design to decommissioning into account, and that this will enable a more predictive and risk-based, rather than reactive, approach to integrity management.

Project participants recently congregated in Aberdeen over a three-day period to hear about the project’s progress, and provide direction for its future development.

Commenting on the project ITF’s technology manager Keith Mackie said: “The large number of project participants illustrates the value of this work to the industry. It’s a great example of collaborative working with input being sought from a range of subsea integrity industry players to ensure that the output is representative of the current status of subsea integrity in the industry as a whole.

“For example a SURF IM workshop was recently held in Oslo at which subsea boosting suppliers were invited to present current technology developments and needs for subsea inspection and condition monitoring, so I believe the knowledge sharing aspect of this project is particularly valuable”.

Recommended for you

More from Energy Voice

Latest Posts