Jubilant Republicans pushed to the verge of the most sweeping rewrite of US tax laws in more than three decades on Tuesday – but perhaps emblematic of the stumbles along the way, there was one last hiccup.
Speaker Paul Ryan, who has worked years towards the goal of revamping the tax code, gleefully pounded the gavel on the final House vote, but then it turned out it was not final after all.
The Senate still expected to pass the legislation on Tuesday night, but the plan to send it on to President Donald Trump for his signature had to be scrapped.
Democrats noted that three provisions violated Senate rules and had to be removed. So the massive bill will be hauled back across the Capitol for the House to re-vote on Wednesday.
Republican House members roared and applauded as their chamber passed the 1.5 trillion dollar (£1.2 trillion) package largely along party lines, 227-203.
Mr Ryan declared, “This was a promise made. This is a promise kept”, as he and other Republican leaders convened a victory news conference moments later.
The Senate was still on track to approve the package that will touch every American taxpayer and every corner of the US economy, providing steep tax cuts for businesses and the wealthy, and more modest help for middle- and low-income families. Despite Republican talk of spending discipline, the bill will push the huge national debt ever higher.
After the delay for a second House vote, the measure then heads to Mr Trump who is aching for a win after 11 months of legislative failures and non-starters. The president tweeted his congratulations to Republican leaders and “all great House Republicans who voted in favor of cutting your taxes!”
Congressional Republicans, who faltered badly in trying to dismantle Barack Obama’s Affordable Care Act, see passage of the tax bill as crucial to proving to Americans they can govern – and imperative for holding on to House and Senate majorities in next year’s midterm elections.
They have repeatedly argued the bill will spur economic growth as corporations, flush with cash, increase wages and hire more workers. But they acknowledge they have work to do in convincing everyday Americans. Many voters in surveys see the legislation as a boost to the wealthy, such as Mr Trump and his family, and a minor gain at best for the middle class.
“I don’t think we’ve done a good job messaging,” said Representative Greg Walden. “Now, you’re able to look at the final product.”
Mr Ryan was positive, even insistent. He declared, “Results are what’s going to make this popular.”
Democrats called the bill a giveaway to corporations and the wealthy, with no likelihood that business owners will use their gains to hire more workers or raise wages. And they mocked the Republicans’ contention that the bill will make taxes so simple that millions can file their returns “on a postcard” – an idea repeated often by the president.
“What happened to the postcard? We’re going to have to carry around a billboard for tax simplification,” declared Representative Richard Neal of Massachusetts, the top Democrat on the Ways and Means Committee.
Tax cuts for corporations would be permanent while the cuts for individuals would expire in 2026 in order to comply with Senate budget rules. The tax cuts would take effect in January, and workers would start to see changes in the amount of taxes withheld from their paychecks in February.
For now, Democrats are planning to use the bill in their campaigns next year. Senate Democrats posted poll numbers on the bill on a video screen at their Tuesday luncheon.
“This bill will come back to haunt them, as Frankenstein did,” said House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi.
The bill would slash the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. The top tax rate for individuals would be lowered from 39.6% to 37%.
The legislation repeals an important part of the 2010 health care law – the requirement that all Americans carry health insurance or face a penalty – as Republicans looks to unravel the law it failed to repeal and replace this past summer. It also allows oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
Recommended for you
Read the latest opinion pieces from our Energy Voice columnists
- How to solve Europe’s energy trilemma
- Standardising specifications: a new approach
- OPINION: Victim’s son fears another Piper Alpha is ‘just around the corner’
- OPINION: Contractor lawyers in demand as firms reluctant to return to bloated workforces
- OPINION: Are Electric Vehicles changing BP’s business model?