Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Locals angry at London firm’s double Highland windfarm plans

Post Thumbnail

A Highland business owner has described a London firm’s plans to build two winfarms virtually side-by-side as ‘horrendous’ for the region.

Mike Spencer-Nairn, owner of Eagle Brae Highland Log Cabins, was responding to feasibility documents seen by Energy Voice outlining plans for two new onshore wind developments on his doorstep.

Site plans show UK wind firm Airvolution’s intention to construct the 27 turbine Fada Windfarm and the 11 turbine Chlamhain Windfarm near Drumindorsair, Beauly.

The London-headquartered company responded last night claiming “no detailed planning work has been undertaken” at the site.

But two separate area layouts released to landowners by Airvolution show the projects would sit only tens of feet apart.

The developments are also understood to be near where German firm ABO Wind abandoned plans for the Allt Carach windfarm in 2015.

Mr Spencer-Nairn said: “Tourism and the scenic value of our glens is our only asset, to obliterate that would be crazy.

“These windfarm developers don’t communicate with the local community, they hold on to the last possible minute.

“They’re obviously trying to withhold the true facts of the amount of impact there will be locally.

“The general feeling in the community is that it’s just not the right place.”

According to the site study, the two windfarms would be developed in conjunction with Norwegian state-owned firm Statkraft.

The project would also see landowners scoop £15,000 per turbine, per year.

John Wallace, development manager for Airvolution, said: “It is too early to consult with the public because, quite simply, the projects don’t exist right now.”

He added that there could be “potential to examine these two sites further”, but that a “lot of studies” would need to be undertaken first and that without interested landowners and environmental impact studies then the windfarms are “far from being real”.

Local anti-windfarm campaigner, Lyndsey Ward called for a community veto on the projects.

She said: “I am particularly furious that we have been targeted so many times despite making it quite clear the communities here are not interested.

“We are not against development here but against the industrialisation that comes with wind development with their access tracks and substations.

“The community veto would be fair and would ensure only wind farms wanted by the local people would go onto planning.

“It would also save wind developers thousands of pounds fighting communities.”

Recommended for you

More from Energy Voice

Latest Posts